PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX SITUS                                                                  S.B. 1203:

                                                                                                    SUMMARY OF BILL

                                                                                     REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senate Bill 1203 (as reported without amendment)

Sponsor:  Senator Jim Runestad

Committee:  Finance

 


CONTENT

 

The bill would amend the General Property Tax Act to specify that, notwithstanding any provision of the Act to the contrary, for the 2021 tax year only, personal property, including exempt personal property, that was located on tax day in an alternate location because of the COVID-19 pandemic could not be assessed in that alternate location but instead would have to be assessed in its ordinary location.

 

"Exempt personal property" would mean personal property exempt from the collection of taxes under the Act, including personal property exempt under Sections 7 to 7ww (real estate exemptions) and Sections 9 to 9o (personal property exempted).

 

"Tax day" would mean that term as described in Section 2(2) (which requires the taxable status of entities, real property, and personal property for a tax year to be determined as of December 31 of the preceding year).

 

"Ordinary location" would mean the geographic area of a local tax collecting unit in Michigan where an item of personal property would have been located for its primary use but for the need to move it to an alternate location due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For these purposes, evidence of the ordinary location of personal property includes either or both of the following:

 

 --    A business location of the owner or other person beneficially entitled to the property or in possession of it, as described in Section 13(1), where the property usually is deployed under conditions unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

 --    If the property was located in the geographic area of a local tax collecting unit in the State on December 31, 2019, that location.

 

"Alternate location" would mean the geographic area of a local tax collecting unit in Michigan that is not the ordinary location of an item of personal property but is the location to which the property was moved due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

MCL 211.14a                                                                  Legislative Analyst:  Jeff Mann

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The bill would have an indeterminate impact on local revenue of likely limited magnitude in the aggregate. The revenue impact could be meaningful for specific local units, depending on whether the impact is compared to previous years or what could happen in tax year 2021 as a result of COVID-19. For property that has been relocated to an alternate location because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact would depend on whether the tax rate in the alternate location was greater than or less than the tax rate in the ordinary location. Absent the bill, property located in an alternate location on tax day would generate additional tax revenue, compared to previous years and what would have happened absent the COVID-19 pandemic, for the local units associated with the alternate locate. Similarly, absent the bill, local units associated with the ordinary location would receive less revenue compared to previous years and what would have happened absent the COVID-19 pandemic. Any impacts would depend on the specific value of affected property and the tax rates in the affected local units.

 

The bill would have no impact on State revenue under the State Education Tax. Under most circumstances, the bill would have no impact on School Aid Fund expenditures (as a result of mills levied for school operating purposes). The State Education Tax is levied at six mills regardless of the location. With the exception of a few hold-harmless jurisdictions, the number of mills levied for school operating purposes is fixed and does not vary by jurisdiction. While the location of the property would affect which school districts generated revenue from school operating mills, and thus the revenue provided by the State to meet the foundation allowance, in aggregate the changes across all increases and decreases would total zero. Because the bill would not affect a district's foundation allowance, the bill would not affect any individual school district's revenue.

 

Date Completed:  11-10-20                                                      Fiscal Analyst:  David Zin

 

 

 

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.