DUTY DEATH BENEFIT - H.B. 4332: COMMITTEE SUMMARY


sans-serif">House Bill 4332 (as passed by the House)

Sponsor: Representative Scott Shackleton

House Committee: Senior Health, Security and Retirement

Senate Committee: Families and Human Services


Date Completed: 4-23-03


CONTENT


The bill would amend the Fire Fighters and Police Officers Retirement Act to prohibit a municipality from denying duty death pension benefits to the remarried surviving spouse of a fire fighter or police officer. Currently, a surviving spouse of an officer whose death is service-connected receives a duty death pension that is to continue for the rest of the surviving spouse’s life or until his or her remarriage.


Under the Act, a municipality may adopt a provision specifying that remarriage does not render a surviving spouse ineligible to receive a duty death or non-duty death pension (which is payable to the surviving spouse of an officer who attained 20 years of service but died before retiring and did not designate a survivor option). If the surviving spouse’s pension was terminated due to his or her remarriage, the surviving spouse must file a written application for reinstatement of the pension with the retirement board. Beginning on the bill’s effective date, as these provisions apply to a surviving spouse who is eligible for a non-duty death pension, the provisions would apply to a municipality upon its governing body’s approval of the resolution.


A surviving spouse who was eligible for a duty death pension and who remarried after the bill’s effective date could not be denied the pension because of the remarriage.


The bill also would delete a provision that, in a city completely surrounded by a city of at least 80,000 whose governing body elected to be included under the provisions of the Act, a non-duty death pension must be paid to the surviving spouse of a member who attains 15 years of service and dies while in the service of the city before retiring.


MCL 35.556-38.556b - Legislative Analyst: Julie Koval


FISCAL IMPACT


The bill would have no fiscal impact on State or local government.


 - Fiscal Analyst: Joe CarrascoS0304\s4332sa

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.