SENATE BILL No. 835
November 29, 2001, Introduced by Senator GARCIA and referred to the Committee on
Finance.
A bill to amend 1980 PA 450, entitled
"The tax increment finance authority act,"
by amending section 15 (MCL 125.1815), as amended by 1996 PA
271.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
1 Sec. 15. (1) By resolution of its board, the authority may
2 authorize, issue, and sell its tax increment bonds, subject to
3 the limitations set forth in this section, to finance a develop-
4 ment program or to refund or refund in advance obligations issued
5 under this act. The bonds
shall mature in not
more than 30
6 years and
are subject to the municipal finance
act, Act No. 202
7 of the Public Acts of
1943, being sections 131.1 to
139.3 of the
8 Michigan Compiled Laws
REVISED MUNICIPAL FINANCE
ACT, 2001 PA
9 34, MCL 141.2101 TO 141.2821.
The bonds issued
under this
10 section shall be
considered a single series for the
purposes of
02311'01 JLB
2
1 section 4 of chapter V of
Act No. 202 of the Public
Acts of 1943,
2 being section 135.4 of
the Michigan Compiled Laws .
3 (2) The municipality by majority vote of the members of its
4 governing body may pledge its full faith and credit for the pay-
5 ment of the principal of and interest on the authority's tax
6 increment bonds. The municipality may pledge as additional
7 security for the bonds any money received by the authority or the
8 municipality pursuant to section 11.
9 (3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this act, if the
10 state treasurer determines that an authority or municipality can
11 issue a qualified refunding obligation and the authority or
12 municipality does not make a good faith effort to issue the qual-
13 ified refunding obligation as determined by the state treasurer,
14 the state treasurer may reduce the amount claimed by the author-
15 ity or municipality under section 12a by an amount equal to the
16 net present value saving that would have been realized had the
17 authority or municipality refunded the obligation or the state
18 treasurer may require a reduction in the capture of tax increment
19 revenues from taxes levied by a local or intermediate school dis-
20 trict or this state by an amount equal to the net present value
21 savings that would have been realized had the authority or munic-
22 ipality refunded the obligation. This subsection does not autho-
23 rize the state treasurer to require the authority or municipality
24 to pledge security greater than the security pledged for the
25 obligation being refunded.
02311'01 Final page. JLB